Accessibility conformance reports that show their work
We test your SaaS product with screen readers on desktop and mobile, then complete your Accessibility Conformance Report in ITI’s VPAT® 2.5Rev INT format, covering WCAG 2.2, Section 508 and EN 301 549. The report names the evaluator and says, for every criterion, what was tested and with what.
$2,450 for up to 12 screens, delivered in 10 business days.
Example: three rows from a sample report on a fictional product (WCAG 2.2 table)
| Criteria | Conformance level | Remarks and explanations |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1.1 Non-text Content Level A | Partially Supports | Charts on the Reports screen have no text alternative; screen readers announce “image” only (NVDA with Firefox, JAWS with Chrome, VoiceOver on iPhone). Icons on the other 11 screens are labelled correctly. |
| 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) Level AA, new in WCAG 2.2 | Supports | Tested by tabbing through all 12 screens at 320, 768 and 1280 pixels wide. The sticky header never hides the focused control. |
| 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value Level A | Does Not Support | Most icon-only buttons have no accessible name, including Export, Filter and Share on 9 of the 12 screens. JAWS and TalkBack announce them as “button”; VoiceOver as “more”. |
The product in these rows is fictional. The level of detail is what you get.
Why buyers read these reports closely now
-
Universities ask for a current one
The HECVAT 4 vendor questionnaire asks whether your accessibility conformance report was created or updated within the past 12 months.
-
Reviewers score the report itself
The University of Vermont, for example, accepts only VPAT® 2.5 templates and stopped accepting VPAT® 2.4 in 2026. Its 16-item rubric lowers a report’s letter grade if it leaves out Section 508 criteria or does not describe manual testing with assistive technology alongside automated testing.
-
Public buyers have dates to meet
Under the ADA Title II web rule, compliance dates for state and local governments start in April 2027. Federal agencies buying under Section 508 routinely ask vendors for an ACR.
What you get
- The report
- Completed in ITI’s VPAT® 2.5Rev INT edition: WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the Revised Section 508 standards, and EN 301 549. Delivered as an accessible PDF and a Word document you can publish.
- Screen reader testing
- Every screen is tested with NVDA and JAWS on Windows, VoiceOver on iPhone and TalkBack on Android, plus keyboard-only use and 200% and 400% zoom.
- A named evaluator
- The report names the person who did the testing, with a direct email address, so your buyer’s reviewer can ask questions.
- A fix list
- Every failure, where it happens, how to reproduce it and which criteria it affects, ordered by impact.
- A stated method
- Our method is based on W3C’s WCAG Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 2.0. Automated checks support the manual testing; they never replace it.
How it works
- Email us your product’s URL, who you sell to, and the screens or tasks your buyers care about most.
- Within one business day you get a written quote with the screen list, a start date and the terms.
- You set up a test account with realistic sample data. We never need production data.
- We test for 10 business days from the agreed start date.
- You receive the report and the fix list. We answer questions about them by email.
Price
$2,450
per report, fixed
- Up to 12 screens or steps in key tasks
- Web applications, tested in desktop and mobile browsers. Native iOS and Android apps are quoted separately
- VPAT® 2.5Rev INT edition: WCAG 2.2 A and AA, Section 508, EN 301 549
- Delivered 10 business days after the start date
- We take on two reports a month, so start dates are booked in order
- Annual updates are quoted separately; HECVAT 4 asks whether the report was created or updated in the past 12 months
- Payment terms are set out in your quote
Questions
Can’t we fill in the VPAT® ourselves?
Yes. ITI, which publishes the template, says anyone can complete it, and there is no official certification. What buyers check is the evidence: who tested, how, and with which assistive technology. That is what we document.
What counts as a screen?
A distinct page layout, or a step in a key task such as signing in, the main dashboard, or each step of a checkout. We agree the list with you before testing, and may suggest changes so the sample reflects how people really use the product. Native mobile apps are not screens of the web product; we quote them separately.
What if our product doesn’t conform?
The report says so, criterion by criterion. We never mark something as supported to help a sale, because a reviewer who checks will find out. The fix list shows what to change, and we can quote a re-test once you have fixed it.
Do you fix the issues too?
No. We evaluate and report. Staying out of the build keeps the report independent.
Do you need access to production data?
No. A test account with realistic sample data is enough. We keep test credentials and evidence only for as long as your agreement says.
Is this a certification?
No. There is no VPAT certification, and ITI does not review or approve ACRs. An ACR is your company’s statement about your product, which buyers then evaluate; we do the testing and write it up so that the statement is accurate.
Who is behind Section 508 Ready?
Section 508 Ready is a service of MySpace MyVibe LLC, a Wyoming company. Reports are tested and written by Vincent Lang’at.
Request a quote
Email us your product’s URL, who your buyers are, and the screens that matter most to them. We reply within one business day.